MD Consult is the world's largest online medical library
Healthy Villages - A Guide for Communities and Community Health Workers
Chapter 2. Achieving good health
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) good health is
not merely the absence of disease; it is also a reflection of the social and
mental well-being of people in a community. Thus, to achieve the WHO goal of
providing health for all, improvements in a community should aim not simply to
reduce disease, but also to reduce social tensions and mental ill-health to
acceptable
levels.
2.1 Factors that influence health
Many factors influence health and some may have both good and
bad influences. For example, surface water bodies can be beneficial as they can
supply water for domestic and agricultural work, may be used for fishing and
recreation, and can create a pleasant environment. However, they can also be
breeding areas for insects and snails that transmit diseases such as malaria,
dengue fever and schistosomiasis. Pollution of water bodies by humans also
increases the risks to health. Factors that influence health can be grouped as
follows:
· The
environment. · The awareness of individuals
and communities about health. · Personal
hygiene. · Health care. · Disease.
The linkages between these factors and health are discussed more
fully below (see also Figure 2.1).
Figure 2.1 Linkages between
factors that affect
health
2.1.1 Environment
The environment includes both the physical environment we live
in and the social fabric of the community, and both significantly influence
health. The physical environment plays an important role in many ways. A clean
environment helps prevent the spread of disease and may reduce depression. For
example, safe and adequate water supplies, sanitation, drainage and solid waste
disposal all benefit health by removing disease vectors from human contact.
Dirty environments, by contrast, encourage the spread of disease and may
adversely influence the mental and emotional well-being of individuals. Industry
and traffic also adversely affect health by polluting the air, water and soil,
and by causing accidents.
Equally important are the home and social environments. When the
home environment is dirty, disease may still spread even if the rest of the
village is clean; and where houses are of poor quality, with poor ventilation
and lighting, other health problems may result, such as premature eyesight
failure or respiratory diseases. The social environment also has a major impact
on health. If people are marginalized because of gender, income status or
ethnic/religious affiliation, they are more likely to be prone to anxiety and
depression and to suffer mental ill-health. In particular, the status of women
in the community is important. In communities where women are discriminated
against, they are more likely to suffer both physical and mental ill-health. By
contrast, in communities that are harmonious, accept differences and promote
resolution of conflict through dialogue, the people are usually more
healthy.
2.1.2 Awareness of health issues
The awareness of individuals about health is fundamental to
promoting a healthier village. If people do not understand the causes of
ill-health and how they can improve their health they cannot make decisions
about investing resources and time to improve their village, or about lobbying
for outside assistance. Such awareness should be developed in all areas that
influence health because the different influences are often interrelated. Unless
people accept that they need an improved environment, better personal hygiene
and better access to adequate health care, investments aimed at improving health
may have only limited impact. It is also essential that community members are
aware that improvements in their environment or hygiene need to be sustained to
achieve long-term improvements in their health. Both community leaders and
governments play important roles in developing this
awareness.
2.1.3 Personal hygiene
Personal hygiene is essential both for improving health and for
sustaining the benefits of interventions. For example, if injuries and minor
cuts are not kept clean, they may become infected and lead to further health
problems. And even though water supplies and sanitation facilities may be
constructed in a community, unless people use these facilities properly and wash
their hands after defecation, store water safely, bathe, and clean clothes and
utensils properly, diseases caused by poor water and sanitation may still
exist.
2.1.4 Health care
All people suffer from disease at some point in their lives and
may need to seek medical advice and treatment. Small children in particular may
be prone to illnesses that require treatment and there are several infectious
diseases for which immunization is recommended (which should be carried out or
supervised by trained medical staff). In all cases, the health outcomes are
profoundly affected by whether health care facilities are available to the
people. Community leaders should therefore lobby national and regional service
providers to locate health care facilities as close to communities as possible
and preferably within the community
itself.
2.1.5 Faecal-oral diseases
Many diseases are caused by food, water and hands that are
contaminated by disease-causing organisms or "pathogens" that come from faeces.
The diseases caused by these pathogens are called faecal-oral diseases because
faecal material is ingested. These diseases, which include dysentery, cholera,
giardiasis, typhoid and intestinal worm infections, are responsible for much
sickness and many deaths each year. Many of these illnesses and deaths occur
unnecessarily, since the faecal-oral routes of disease transmission are among
the most easily blocked. There are several faecal-oral routes of transmission
(Figure 2.2). For example, many infectious diseases are spread through poorly
prepared and stored food, and many epidemics start with the consumption of poor
quality food, or from drinking contaminated water. Good quality drinking-water
and good personal hygiene in food preparation and handling are therefore of
utmost importance in preventing the spread of these
diseases.
2.1.6 Vector-borne diseases
Diseases transmitted by vectors such as mosquitoes (malaria) and
sandflies (leishmaniasis) and those with intermediate hosts in fresh water such
as snails (schistosomiasis) place a heavy burden on rural communities in the
tropics and subtropics. They are closely linked to the characteristics of the
local ecology (e.g. standing water or irrigation systems), human behaviour
(water contact patterns) and socioeconomic status (capacity to maintain a clean
environment). Since the flight range of most disease-carrying insects is
relatively limited and the transmission of schistosomiasis is restricted to
water contact points, communities can make substantial contributions towards
making villages healthier by managing their environment; by using simple vector
control procedures; and by cleaning the village and its surroundings. In many
instances these procedures can be incorporated into daily village routines, for
example by modifying agricultural
practices.
2.2 Identifying health problems and establishing priorities
Figure 2.2 Faecal-oral routes
of disease transmission
To improve the health of people in a community a number of
problems may need to be resolved. While it is better to address these problems
in an integrated way, it may be necessary to establish priorities and deal with
the most pressing issues immediately. This situation could arise, for example,
if communities or service providers have limited resources and can tackle only a
few problems at a time. Community members may also have different perceptions of
the main problems: people living in low-lying areas prone to flooding may feel
that drainage is the major problem to be resolved, whereas those living in
higher areas may be more concerned with water supply. If external bodies alone
are responsible for prioritizing the issues, the priorities may not reflect
community concerns and there may be a more limited sense of community ownership
of a project.
Two questionnaires are provided in this guide that allow
community members to identify major health issues in their community and
establish health priorities. However, to ensure that community priorities are
understood and that needs are met, it is essential to involve the different
stakeholders in a community. Women and men, rich and poor, children and the
elderly, and different ethnic and religious groups may all have different health
priorities, and while it may not be possible to accommodate every view, the
final list of priorities should reflect what most people believe are important
health issues. To identify health problems in a community, community members
should try to answer the questions listed below and then discuss the most
pressing issues. During the discussion community members can try to list (or
rank) the problems identified in order of importance.
Identifying community health issues
· Is diarrhoea
common among children?
· Are worm infections common?
· Are respiratory (breathing)
problems common?
· Are eyesight problems common,
particularly among women?
· Are malaria or other
vector-borne diseases common?
· Do many people have fevers?
· Have there been recent
outbreaks of disease that affected many people in your community?
· Are children undernourished?
Do they look thin or lack energy?
· Are there health workers or
facilities (clinics or health centres) in the community?
· Do any children or adults have
a mental health problem (e.g. psychosis)?
· What are the major health problems identified by
community members? List them in order of importance.
2.2.1 Assessing community perceptions about health
To help identify the most important health problems in a
community, the perceptions of community members about health should be assessed.
It is important that all sections of the community are involved in these
assessments. Different methods for achieving this goal are discussed below.
Questionnaires
One way to find out what people think is to use a community
questionnaire. Because questionnaires may be answered by many people (sometimes,
every household in the community) they can provide good information about the
perceptions of community members towards health problems and health priorities.
However, questionnaires have limitations. Frequently, it may be difficult for
community members to devise their own questionnaires and the information
collected may require sophisticated analysis. As a result, it is likely that
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) or local government staff will administer
the questionnaires, rather than community members. Nevertheless, the community
should always ask for feedback on the findings. Because the questions must be
defined before the information is collected, the information will be limited to
these issues. Questionnaires may not therefore be flexible enough to include
other issues of importance to the community.
Participatory approaches
Because of the limitations of questionnaires, a number of other
techniques have been developed. They are often grouped together and referred to
as a participatory rural (or rapid) appraisal. The techniques allow the
community itself to develop areas for discussion, rather than using
questionnaire responses to define the topics. These techniques are sometimes
used with questionnaires: by asking the same question in different ways during
community discussions, issues raised by questionnaire respondents can be
verified. More information about the techniques can be found in the documents
listed in Annex 2. They are briefly discussed below to provide an idea of how
such techniques may be used.
Participatory approaches cover a range of techniques, including
key informant interviews, group discussions and observations. Although these
techniques are often used by trained staff, they can also be used by community
leaders to assess the perceptions of community members about health issues. When
using these techniques it is important to balance the need to discuss all issues
of community concern with the need to remain focused on the principal objective
- assessment of community health priorities.
Key informant interviews are discussions with key people within
a community who have a special interest in, or responsibility for, improving
health. Key informants include women's leaders, youth leaders, religious leaders
and health workers. The interviews are usually structured, in that the
interviewer has the objective of obtaining information on key health issues.
Rather than directly asking prepared questions, however, the interviewer can
instead prepare topic guides to ensure that the principal areas of interest are
covered during the course of discussions. The objective of each interview should
be clearly defined and the community members best placed to provide answers
should be identified.
Example topic guide Uganda: focus group
discussion on water usage
Goal:
To determine which sources of water are used for
consumption.
Topics:
· What water sources
are available to the community? · Which local
water sources do people commonly use? · What
are the water sources used for? · What
influences decisions to use the sources?
A focus group discussion is a technique that brings together
groups of people to discuss a particular issue, often in an informal setting as
illustrated in Figures 2.3 and 2.4. The role of the group facilitator is to help
the group to identify key issues related to the topic under discussion, while
allowing sufficient flexibility to cover all aspects of the topic to everyone's
satisfaction. To help foster agreement about the key issues, it is better to
establish a goal or objective that the whole group agrees with from the outset.
For example, the goal may be to decide which problems are most important to
resolve. Sometimes people may give responses that are not relevant, or that
appear silly or amusing to the other group members. It is important that people
do not feel they are being ridiculed for their views. This can be accomplished
by saying, for example, "That is a good point, but maybe we need to discuss the
relevance of this."
Figure 2.3 Focus group
discussions
Figure 2.4 Small community
discussions
Problems may arise during group discussions which can lead to
biased answers or dissatisfaction among group members. For example, the
discussion may be dominated by a few individuals who express their point of view
forcefully and prevent others from fully participating. Lack of contribution by
some members may also be a problem and it may be necessary to directly ask such
individuals what they think about a particular issue. However, care should be
taken not to appear too aggressive or insistent since some people find it hard
to talk in front of others. One approach that may help everyone to feel
comfortable during discussion is to select individuals from specific groups,
such as women or young people, rather than include a mix of people in the
discussion. To overcome problems in group discussions, it is important to set
ground rules at the outset of the discussion which all members agree to abide
by. If this is not done, the discussion may become heated, some people may
dominate the group and others may feel disappointed with the discussion.
Ground rules for focus group discussions
· There are no right
or wrong answers, just different opinions.
· Everyone has the right to
express their opinion and should not be penalized if the group feels the opinion
is not relevant or interesting.
· Only one person at a time
should talk; when someone wants to contribute they should raise their hand.
· No one person should dominate
the discussion - all should be allowed to contribute.
Different sections of the community may have different opinions
about which problems are most important. To reflect this, different groups in
the community can prepare a map that locates the most important problems. The
map can then be used as a discussion tool with the groups to help community
members decide which activities should be undertaken to improve the health of
the overall community.
Key points for collecting information from a
community
· All sections of
the community should have input into the process. Priorities established by only
a few people may not cover all needs adequately.
· Decide from the start how the
information will be used. This should be developed with the whole community.
· Make sure the information is
reliable.
2.2.2 Identifying causes of health problems
Once the major health problems in a community have been
identified, the underlying causes need to be examined so that priorities for
action can be ranked. For example, diarrhoea in a community may be caused by
poor-quality water, by unhygienic food, or by a lack of sanitation, and the type
of intervention required will depend on the nature of the underlying cause. To
help identify the principal causes of ill-health in a community and the most
important areas to improve, community members can complete the following
questionnaire and discuss the findings with the whole community.
Identifying causes of community health problems
· What types of
water supply does the community have?
· Is the water source protected
and/or treated?
· How much water is collected by
households?
· Is the water always available?
· Does everyone have access to
water?
· Does the community know the
quality of the water?
· Are there special places for
bathing and laundry?
· Do households have some form
of sanitation?
· What types of sanitation are
there?
· Are there separate facilities
for women (in areas where mixed facilities are unacceptable)?
· Is solid waste disposed of, or
does waste build up in the village?
· How is solid waste disposed
of?
· Are there stagnant or standing
bodies of water in the community?
· Is there a system of drainage
in homes and for the community?
· Is there a market in the
community?
· Is the market area cleaned
every day?
· Is the market dirty?
· Is meat sold at the market?
· Is the meat always fresh?
· Are market vendors careful
with personal hygiene and do they keep their hands clean?
· Does the market have water
supply and sanitation facilities?
· Are chemicals used or stored
in the community?
· How are they stored?
· How are chemicals disposed of?
· Do houses in the community
have many windows?
· What cooking fuel is used in
the community?
· Where do people cook in the
community?
· What materials are used for
house construction?
· Are mosquitoes, flies and
other insects common in the community?
· Are rats and other vermin
common?
· Are cattle or other domestic
animals kept close to homes?
· Are the same bodies of water
used for washing, laundering and receiving human and animal wastes?
What are the major problems? List them in order of importance to
the community.
2.3 Using the information
Whichever techniques are used it is essential that the
information obtained reflects broad opinion in the community, is reliable and
can be translated into action. Once the major causes of ill-health have been
identified by the community and the necessary interventions agreed upon, the
resources required must be identified. If the community lacks the necessary
resources, representatives of the local government and NGOs can be contacted to
discuss how best to carry out the improvements. It may be possible to prepare a
proposal that identifies the work the community would like to undertake, how
much the improvements would cost and the contributions community members
themselves can make.
The time and money required to keep improved facilities working
should also be considered, because benefits may be short-lived if the community
cannot afford to maintain improvements. It is important therefore to discuss
with community members, local governments and NGOs the long-term requirements of
improvements and whether they are affordable. This will help community members
to select options most suited to community needs and
resources.